Homicide Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THOMSON, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Homicide Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, 110-128 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1088767997001002002
© 1997 SAGE Publications

Deterrence Versus Brutalization

The Case of Arizona

ERNIE THOMSON

Arizona State University West

For several decades, the debates and research regarding the death penalty and deterrence have focused on whether the assumed deterrent effects were real. The rise of brutalization theory, and the growing evidence in support of the theory, poses a dilemma with a different significance: It appears that executions cause more homicides than they prevent and thus increase homicide rates. This study of deterrent and brutalization effects of an Arizona execution partially replicates and extends a study that used a naturally occurring quasi-experimental situation to assess the impact of an Oklahoma execution on different (i.e., disaggregated) types of homicides in Oklahoma. The findings are consistent with those of the Oklahoma study, and indicate that Arizona's first execution in more than 29 years had no deterrent effect on Arizona homicides, but instead, led to increases in several types of homicides consistent with the predictions of brutalization theory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
E. G. Lambert, S. Pasupuleti, Shanhe Jiang, K. Jaishankar, and J. V. Bhimarasetty
Views on the death penalty among college students in India
Punishment Society, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 207 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
B. WIERSEMA, C. LOFTIN, and D. McDOWALL
A Comparison of Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Vital Statistics System Homicide Estimates for U.S. Counties
Homicide Studies, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 317 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. Sorensen, R. Wrinkle, V. Brewer, and J. Marquart
Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Examining the Effect of Executions on Murder in Texas
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 1999; 45(4): 481 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
E. THOMSON
Effects of an Execution on Homicides in California
Homicide Studies, May 1, 1999; 3(2): 129 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]