Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Homicide Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLOCK, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by DEVITT, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond Public Records Databases

Field Strategies for Locating and Interviewing Proxy Respondents in Homicide Research

CAROLYN REBECCA BLOCK

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority

JUDITH M. McFARLANE

Texas Woman's University

GAIL RAYFORD WALKER

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority

CHRISTINE OVCHARCHYN DEVITT

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority

As a means of better understanding homicide incidents, methods for identifying, locating, and interviewing confidants of homicide victims are still in their infancy. This article discusses a set of strategies that worked in studies conducted on risk of injury and death in intimate partner relationships in Houston and Chicago and key factors that may affect completion rates of proxy interviews. Primary considerations when using proxy respondent methodology include maximizing the use of public records, hiring and training interviewers for fieldwork skills as well as interview skills, and developing a protocol for interviewer and respondent safety.

Homicide Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, 349-366 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1088767999003004006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
R. Campbell, A. E. Adams, S. M. Wasco, C. E. Ahrens, and T. Sefl
Training Interviewers for Research on Sexual Violence: A Qualitative Study of Rape Survivors' Recommendations for Interview Practice
Violence Against Women, May 1, 2009; 15(5): 595 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
J. C. Campbell, D. W. Webster, and N. Glass
The Danger Assessment: Validation of a Lethality Risk Assessment Instrument for Intimate Partner Femicide
J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2009; 24(4): 653 - 674.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Homicide StudiesHome page
N. Glass, K. Laughon, C. Rutto, J. Bevacqua, and J. C. Campbell
Young Adult Intimate Partner Femicide: An Exploratory Study
Homicide Studies, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Violence Against WomenHome page
N. Glass, J. Koziol-McLain, J. Campbell, and C. R. Block
Female-Perpetrated Femicide and Attempted Femicide: A Case Study
Violence Against Women, June 1, 2004; 10(6): 606 - 625.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
J. McFarlane, J. C. Campbell, and K. Watson
The Use of the Justice System Prior to Intimate Partner Femicide
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2001; 26(2): 193 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]