Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Homicide Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chamlin, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Cochran, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ascribed Economic Inequality and Homicide Among Modern Societies

Toward the Development of a Cross-National Theory

Mitchell B. Chamlin

University of Cincinnati

John K. Cochran

University of South Florida

Although a great number of studies have established, through a variety ofmethodologies, the existence of a positive association between economic inequality and homicide rates cross-culturally, none, in our view, have offered a sound theoretical explanation for this association. Almost all of these accounts suffer from problems of reductionism in that they offer social-psychological explanations for macro-social phenomena. They also provide explanations that cannot be logically extended to the crime of homicide, which cannot be falsified due to the lack of the data necessary to critically test them and/or are limited to the United States but cannot logically be extended cross-nationally. In this article, the authors offer a solution to this problem that avoids invoking reductionist explanations. This macro-social approach distinguishes between achieved and ascribed bases of economic inequality, arguing that variations in cross-national rates of homicide among modern societies are best explained by high levels of ascribed economic inequality.

Key Words: economic inequality • macro-theory • homicide • legitimacy

Homicide Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 3-29 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1088767904271432


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
M. B. Chamlin and J. K. Cochran
An evaluation of the assumptions that underlie institutional anomie theory
Theoretical Criminology, February 1, 2007; 11(1): 39 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
M. B. Chamlin and J. K. Cochran
Economic Inequality, Legitimacy, and Cross-National Homicide Rates
Homicide Studies, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 231 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]