This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, S. Articles by Maume, M. O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Have Gun Will Shoot?

Weapon Instrumentality, Intent, and the Violent Escalation of Conflict

University of Denver, Scott.Phillips{at}du.edu

Michael O. Maume

University of North Carolina Wilmington

The weapon instrumentality hypothesis suggests that guns contribute to the escalation and lethality of violence. But the relationship between guns and violence might be spurious if the aggressor's violent tendencies or the aggressor's situation-specific intent to harm is the common cause of the presence/use of a gun and the violent outcome. To examine such rival explanations, we draw on interviews with 100 men imprisoned for an aggravated assault or homicide that stemmed from an interpersonal conflict. Each respondent described a matched pair of conflicts: the violent conflict that led to incarceration and a similar nonviolent conflict from the same time period. The matched pair design allows us to control for both potential sources of spuriousness: violent tendencies and situation-specific intent to harm. The results suggest that guns contribute to the violent escalation of conflict, but the impact of guns attenuates substantially after accounting for situation-specific intent to harm.

Key Words: guns • violence • weapon instrumentality • intent • conflict

References

• Berkowitz, L., & LePage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 202-207.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Bernard, T.J. (1990). Angry aggression among the "Truly Disadvantaged." Criminology, 28, 73-96.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Black, D. (1995). The epistemology of pure sociology. Law and Social Inquiry, 20, 829-870.[CrossRef]
• Buss, A.H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: John Wiley.
• Cooney, M., & Phillips, S. (2002). Typologizing violence: A Blackian perspective. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 22, 71-104.
• Corzine, J., Huff-Corzine, L., Jarvis, J.P., Clifford Wittekind, J.E., Weaver, G.S., & Petee, T.A. (2004). The gun and the knife: Weapon instrumentality and homicide revisited. In V. P. Bunge, C. R. Block & M. Lane (Eds.), Linking data to practice in violence and homicide prevention: Proceedings of the 2004 meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group (pp. 207-217). Chicago: HRWG Publications.
• Ellis, D.P., Weinir, P., & Miller, L. (1971). Does the trigger pull the finger? An experimental test of weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Sociometry, 34, 453-465.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Fagan, J., & Wilkinson, D.L. (1998). Guns, youth violence, and social identity in inner cities. In M. Tonry & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol 24, pp. 105-188). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2005. Crime in the United States. Retreived July 17, 2007, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/offenses/expanded_information/data/shrtable_07.html
• Felson, R.B., & Messner, S.F. (1996). To kill or not to kill? Lethal outcomes in injurious attacks. Criminology, 34, 519-545.[CrossRef]
• Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Hardt, R.H. & Peterson-Hardt, S. (1977). On determining the quality of the delinquency self-report method. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 14, 247-261.[Abstract]
• Hindelang, M.J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J.G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
• Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D.S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 293-327.
• Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.
• Kleck, G. (1991). Point blank: Guns and violence in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Kleck, G. (1997). Targeting Guns: Firearms and their control. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Kleck, G., & McElrath, K. (1991). The effects of weaponry on human violence. Social Force, 69, 669-692.[CrossRef]
• Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Marquis, K.H. (1981). Quality of prisoner self reports: Arrest and conviction response errors. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
• McClendon, M.J. (1994). Multiple regression and causal analysis. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
• National Research Council. (2004). Firearms and violence: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Phillips, S. (2003). The social structure of vengeance: A test of Black's model. Criminology, 41, 673-708.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Phillips, S., & Cooney, M. (2005). Aiding peace, abetting violence: Third parties and the management of conflict. American Sociological Review, 70, 334-354.[Web of Science]
• Phillips, S., Matusko, J., & Tomasovic, E. (2007). Reconsidering the relationship between alcohol and lethal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 66-84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Rogers, W. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19-23.
• Steinberg, D. (1992). Application of conditional logistic regression methods to event history and multiple choice data. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, 35, 157-161.
• Stokes, M.E., Davis, C.S., & Koch, G.G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
• Tedeschi, J.T., & Felson, R.B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Weesie, J. (1999). Seemingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator. Stata Technical Bulletin, 52, 34-47.
• Wells, W., & Horney, J. (2002). Weapon effects and individual intent to do harm: Influences on the escalation of violence. Criminology, 40, 265-296.[CrossRef]
• Wolfgang, M.E. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
• Wright, J.D., & Rossi, P.H. (1986). Armed and considered dangerous: A survey of felons and their firearms. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Wright, J.D., Rossi, P.H., & Daly, K. (1983). Under the gun: Weapons, crime, and violence in America. New York: Aldine.
• Zimring, F.E. (1968). Is gun control likely to reduce violent killings? University of Chicago Law Review, 35, 721-737.[CrossRef]
• Zimring, F.E. (1972). The medium is the message: Firearm caliber as a determinant of death from assault. Journal of Legal Studies, 35, 21-37.

Homicide Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, 272-294 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1088767907306507


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, S. Articles by Maume, M. O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?